Legal Opinion

Bray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1975No. 44945, 44995, 44946 and 44996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

Appeals by defendant railroad from judgments in favor of plaintiffs and from the order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. We affirm.

These actions arose out of a collision on February 15, 1968, between a truck operated by plaintiff George H. Bray in which plaintiff Lynn J. Citurs was a passenger and a train owned and operated by defendant, Chicago Bock Island and Pacific Bailroad Company. Plaintiffs brought their actions for recovery of personal injuries and their wives made claims for loss…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Mellett v. Fairview Health ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Reichel Foods, Inc. v. Proseal America, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API