Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1977No. 47828PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Rule 29.03, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court suppressing physical evidence after an omnibus hearing in the prosecution of defendants for two counts each of felonious theft. Issues raised by the appeal relate to the plain-sight and the search-incident-to-arrest exceptions to the general rule prohibiting warrantless searches and seizures. We affirm the suppression order in part and reverse it in part, and remand the case for trial.

At 11:30 p. m. on February 22, 1977, two St. Paul policemen were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. StreitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. United States v. Alexander LisznyaiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. AlessoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API