Legal Opinion

Leach v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1990No. CR90-51PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Randy D. Leach seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent his being tried on one conspiracy charge, and he asks that the trial court be instructed to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he should be tried on another. His fundamental point is that he has been convicted on yet a third conspiracy charge and that, because all were included in a single conspiracy, it would constitute double jeopardy to try him again. We have no basis at this stage of the litigation to hold that it would constitute double jeopardy to try Leach on the one charge as to which he seeks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fore v. Circuit Court of Izard CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Braswell v. GehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Smith v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Abernathy v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Reynolds v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Ibsen v. PleggeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Ford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API