People v. Sizelove
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From convictions of burglary and from the order denying their motions for a new trial, appellants seek a reversal on the grounds of asserted errors in rulings during the conduct of the trial and in refusing to give an instruction in the language proposed by them. While in their notice to the clerk they included the insufficiency of the evidence as a basis for appeal, it was not mentioned in their brief. Good reason: they were apprehended while attempting to escape and admitted having entered the home of Richard Koon in Lakewood. Defendant Hall besought his captor for a “break” to escape.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. MoraniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. BurroughsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.