People v. Bernal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction of burglary, second degree (Pen. Code, § 459.)
Facts
There is no substantial dispute as to the physical facts. Only inferences and evidence of knowledge and intent are in possible conflict. During the evening of October 22, 1961, appellant and one Richard Prank White were patrons of the Goldstone Bar, Barstow, California. Some time during the evening, White unscrewed the screws on the inside of the back door latch or lock. He did not tell appellant of this but claims that some two weeks previously he had proposed to her that they…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. TholkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.