Legal Opinion

Pamela Equities Corp. v. Louis Frey Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 8, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

Although it is a well-established rule that the nature and purpose of summary proceedings are such that disclosure should rarely be granted, where the summary proceeding concerns complex rent escalation charges billed as “additional rent” under the terms of the lease, covering an extensive time period, a presumption in favor of permitting discovery should be indulged in by a court.

The respondent seeks discovery and inspection of certain records that purportedly relate to the petitioner’s claim for operating expenses, electricity, real estate tax and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antillean Holding Co. v. LindleyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  2. Atkinson v. TrestanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  3. 180 Tenants Corp. v. UngarCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York University v. FarkasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  2. Parksouth Dental Group v. East River RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of Trinity Church v. Chung King House of Metal, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
  4. Smilow v. UlrichCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API