Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Pabst Brewing Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 7, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-200PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
This action arises out of a hard-fought proxy contest for control of Pabst Brewing Company (“Pabst”), between the incumbent management and an insurgent group, the Shareholders’ Committee to Revitalize Pabst (“Revitalization Committee”). Plaintiffs Irwin L. Jacobs, Gerald A. Schwalbach, Dennis M. Mathisen, Daniel T. Lindsay, and the Revitalization Committee (“Jacobs Group”) have filed a First Amended Complaint against Pabst and Torray Clark & Co. Incorporated (“Torray Clark”), alleging six causes of action. 1 (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 51.) The first three causes allege that…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Rennie v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Billy Lamb and Carmon Willis v. Phillip Morris, Inc. And B.A.T. Industries, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Lewis Ex Rel. National Semiconductor Corp. v. SporckDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. KhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.