Legal Opinion
Sarkissian v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated October 17, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion for leave to serve an amended notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, as the plaintiff failed to provide a correct description of the location of the accident in his notice of claim (see Brown v City of New York, 265 AD2d 284 [1999];…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Zapata v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Richard v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Flanagan v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Torres v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Charleston v. Incorporated VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bottini v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Marino v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Weissman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010