Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1963No. 5-3096PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The appellants and appellees are adjoining landowners. The appellants brought this action to settle a boundary line dispute between them. In resolving the issues and the conflicting testimony in favor of the appellees, the Court found:

í í * * * The driveway presently used by the defendants is situated upon the boundary line between the parties as established and recognized by the respective owners of the tracts for a long period of years, considerably exceeding seven years prior to the bringing of this present action; that the lands owned by the plaintiffs lie…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Murphy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Tull v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Hill v. BarnardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Walker v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Camp v. LiberatoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Brown v. WindlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Council v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API