Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Michael Kessler, Donald Gene Booth, Inez Eaton Guerrero, Patrick John O'shea, and Cynthia Lorraine
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1982No. 82-1544PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This case is before us a second time, the cause having been remanded for the trial court’s further determination respecting the admissibility of certain eyewitness testimony in United States v. Booth, 669 F.2d 1231 (9th Cir.1981). As we again find an inadequate basis for the trial court’s suppression order, we reverse.
The facts of the case are set forth in our earlier opinion. The eyewitness testimony is from bank tellers asked to view a suspect police returned to the bank in handcuffs an hour after the crime was committed. Appellee Booth states it is crucial to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PlunkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald David JONES, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Inez Eaton Guerrero, Patrick John O'shea, Stephen Michael Kessler, Cynthia Walker and Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ernest Frank Clark and Eric GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.