People v. Velasco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUFFY, J.
Defendant Ernest Jacinto Velasco appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict. The jury convicted him of possessing a shank in prison. On appeal, defendant claims that the state violated his constitutional rights when prison guards failed to gather and thereafter preserve other evidence they noticed when they found the shank.
We will affirm the judgment.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AND FACTS
I. Procedural Background
A jury convicted defendant of one count of possessing a weapon while in penal custody. (Pen. Code, § 4502, subd. (a).) The jury found true two allegations…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Berg CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. FultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Jernigan CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Rodarte CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014