Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2010No. 38A02-1002-PC-137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Petitioner, Paul E. Armstrong, Jr. (Armstrong), appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Armstrong presents four issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) Whether his first trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel when she permitted Armstrong to plead guilty;(2) Whether Armstrong's plea of guilty was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary;(8) Whether a sufficient factual basis was established to support his plea of guilty to delivering methamphetamine, as a Class A felony, under former…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cathy Rexroad v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. d/b/a R+L Carriers, r&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, and Richard C. Maples, Sr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Christopher A. Neeley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Kenny Green v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Logan Bradley Lake v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Oscar Iraheta-Rosales v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API