Legal Opinion

Scoufos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 2001No. 94,395PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

{1 Resolution of today's cause requires the Court to measure the trial court's February 11, 2000 class-certification order against the prerequisites for issuing the same enunciated in 12 0.S8.1991 § 2028(A) & (B). 1 In so doing we need not reach the merits of Harry Scoufos IV's [Seoufos, plaintiff, class representative or insured] claim. Nonetheless, determining whether the trial court applied the correct legal standards when it assessed § 2028's commonality, predominance and typicality requirements for class certification necessitates identification and review of the core liability issues…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Fent v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. KMC Leasing, Inc. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Mattoon v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API