Scoufos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
{1 Resolution of today's cause requires the Court to measure the trial court's February 11, 2000 class-certification order against the prerequisites for issuing the same enunciated in 12 0.S8.1991 § 2028(A) & (B). 1 In so doing we need not reach the merits of Harry Scoufos IV's [Seoufos, plaintiff, class representative or insured] claim. Nonetheless, determining whether the trial court applied the correct legal standards when it assessed § 2028's commonality, predominance and typicality requirements for class certification necessitates identification and review of the core liability issues…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fent v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- KMC Leasing, Inc. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Mattoon v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Tyler v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.