Legal Opinion

The Appam

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 3, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Libel by the British & African Steam Navigation Company, Limited, against the proceeds of the cargo of the Appqm. On hearing on exception to- libel.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

This pendant to the celebrated litigation over the Appam (243 U. S. 124, 37 Sup. Ct. 337, 61 L. Ed 633) seeks to raise the single question whether, under the facts shown and the law of Great Britain, a lien for freight exists in favor of the Appam’s owners against the late cargo of that vessel or the proceeds thereof.

The action is in rem, and the res proceeded against is money producá by sale of cargo—a sale in pari conducted by those to whom the *232cargo was finally awarded, and in part a judicial sale pendente lite of so much of the lading as was confessedly perishable.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The SirenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. The Eliza LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. The Eliza LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. The Nathaniel HooperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1839

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Owens v. BreitungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API