Legal Opinion

Brenda and John Stachowski v. Estate of Daniel Radman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2018No. 71A05-1708-CT-1776PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

[1] In this case we address the difference between (1) a negligence-per-se claim, in which a plaintiff argues that the defendant's violation of a statute or ordinance suffices to prove breach of an existing common-law duty of reasonable care, and (2) a private-right-of-action claim, in which a plaintiff asserts that a statute or ordinance, itself, created an enforceable duty.

[2] Brenda and John Stachowski have sued the Estate of Daniel Radman for negligence, claiming that Brenda fell *544 through an allegedly rotten handrail on the deck of a home in South Bend that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brian Yost v. Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity- Indiana Gamma Chapter at Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., and Nathan CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cook v. Whitsell-ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gretchen D. Cuyler, Special Administrator of the Estate of Christian Cuyler, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. F.D. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. ATES v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
  2. Alfred Stanley v. Dorothy Deverick (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Alvarez v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Baker v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Barbee v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API