Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin Clardy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2017No. 17-5094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Kevin Clardy argues that he has not waived the right to challenge his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), despite explicitly waiving that right in his plea agreement. We have rejected this argument multiple times, albeit in unpublished opinions. The district court likewise rejected it here. We affirm.

In 2009, Clardy pled guilty to possessing a firearm as a convicted felon and to possessing over 50 grams of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute it. He agreed neither to appeal his eventual sentence nor to challenge it under various statutes. In particular, the relevant section of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Nikita GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Wayne GoodloeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Todd BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henry Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, P.C., et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API