Legal Opinion

Robert D. Rodriguez v. Susan Belingheri, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 23, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02538Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:24-cv-2538 TLN AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 SUSAN BELINGHERI, et al, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this matter pro se; pre-trial proceedings 17 are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant State 18 Bar of California and its defendant employees (collectively, “State Bar”) filed a motion to dismiss 19 for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 30.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API