Legal Opinion
Asylum Hill Problem Solving Revitalization Ass'n v. King
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 2006No. SC 17313PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiffs, the Asylum Hill Problem Solving Revitalization Association (revitalization association) and Adrienne Brown, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Gary E. King, the president and executive director of the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (finance authority), following the trial court’s decision to strike all three counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint. Generally stated, the issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs can bring a cause of action to compel the finance authority to take affirmative steps to prevent…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Curry v. Allan S. Goodman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Provencher v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. RuparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Gerardi v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.