Hutton v. State

DAVIS, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Charles Hutton appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, in which he claimed that he had not received adequate credit for time spent in confinement. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

ISSUES

[¶2] Hutton raises two issues. We reword them as follows.

1. Is Hutton entitled to credit for participation in both residential and non-residential programs at an adult community corrections facility?

*9692. Did he receive full credit for confinement related to his second of three probation…