City of Birmingham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Inc. (State Farm), in its declaratory judgment action against the City of Birmingham (Birmingham) and the latter’s counterclaim. We affirm.
The action grew out of Birmingham’s interpretation and application of Code of 1975, § 11-51-120 to State Farm and its refusal to apply, instead, the provisions of § 11-51-121. Those taxation statutes allow a municipal corporation to impose a privilege tax under this pertinent language:
§ 11-51-120. Insurance companies — Fire and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nachman v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Henry v. ShevinskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- City of Sheffield v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Motors Insurance Corporation v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007