Legal Opinion
N-A-M
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3588PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 336
(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3588 In re N-A-M-, Respondent Decided October 24, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to be considered a particularly serious crime under section 241(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii) (2000), an offense need not be an aggravated felony under section 101(a)(43) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) (2000 & Supp. IV 2004). (2) Once the elements of an offense are found to potentially bring it within the ambit of a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Oscar Rojas-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert S. Coleman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- FRENTESCUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Oyenike Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States Secretary of Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Delgado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Denis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Anaya-Ortiz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Antipas Konou v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Nethagani v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.