Legal Opinion

Chivers v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 10, 1991No. 05-89-01039-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

Michael Anthony Chivers appeals from a conviction of burglary of a building. After the jury returned a guilty verdict, the trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at twenty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1 In a single point of error, Chivers contends that the jury selection occurred in a racially discriminatory manner. Because we hold that the State did not provide a racially neutral explanation for one of its peremptory challenges, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Tompkins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. C_ E_ J v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Thomas Earl Whitfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. Billy Jay Burris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API