Legal Opinion

Ruth v. S. Z. B. Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederick Backer, J.

The defendant S. Z. B. Corporation has moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint. The plaintiffs have, without formal cross motion, requested summary judgment be granted in their favor. After extended argument before the court, buttressed by able, comprehensive briefs by the litigants, they are both in agreement that there is no triable issue of fact but that the conflict solely involves questions of law.

The underlying action has been brought by the plaintiffs, who are the owners of the property involved, to recover possession of same from the S. Z. B. Corporation, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheets v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Earl v. NalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Horton v. New York Central & Hudson River R.R.New York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Altman v. Alaska Truss & Manufacturing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Altman v. Alaska Truss & Manufacturing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API