Legal Opinion
Samuel E. Haley v. Bill Armontrout
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1991No. 89-2989WMPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, District Judge.
Samuel E. Haley, a Missouri prisoner convicted of assault and robbery, appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Haley argues that the district court erred in not providing him an evidentiary hearing. Haley contends that (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in the state court criminal proceedings; (2) the search which led to his arrest was unlawful; (3) the convictions and sentence imposed were violative of the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment; and (4) the exclusion of women…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dwight Wharton-El v. Crispus NixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Jimmie L. Weekley v. Jimmy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Deck v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017
- Frazier v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Rogers v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.