Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Hauskins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1983No. A8012-06998, CA A23979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In this declaratory judgment action plaintiff contends, inter alia, that he is the owner of one-half of the shares of defendant M & H Manufacturing, Inc. (corporation) and that the corporation and its principal shareholder, defendant Hauskins, owe plaintiff one-half of the proceeds received from the sale of the corporation to defendant B & E Anderson Investment Company. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment for defendants. We reverse.

The ultimate question is whether a $20,000 payment from plaintiff to Hauskins was for the purchase of shares of the corporation or was made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Alair Aviation Services, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nikolov v. Associated Environmental ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API