Legal Opinion

City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Dimon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2016No. 16681 650294/12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered January 16, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that plaintiff failed to adequately plead demand futility based on defendants’ lack of disinterest or breach of the duty of loyalty (see Rales v Blasband, 634 A2d 927, 936 [Del 1993]). The complaint fails to allege particularized facts showing the substantial likelihood of defendants’ personal liability as a result of any intentional misconduct, that they consciously…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Security Police & Fire Professionals of America Retirement Fund v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API