Legal Opinion

Jones v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 17, 2001No. 00-2992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*541ORDER

Terrell Jones, Jr. appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging that Syntex Laboratories, Inc. and Syntex (USA), Inc. (collectively “Syntex”) manufactured and sold defective infant formula that caused him permanent mental and developmental damage. Because we disagree with the district court that the action was barred by res judicata, we vacate the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

From his birth in May 1979, Terrell Jones was fed Syntex’s soy-based formula marketed under the name “Neo-Mull Soy.” As an infant, Terrell had been suffering from a series of unexplained illnesses…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. S.C. Vaughan Oil Co. v. Caldwell, Troutt & AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carol Lebeau v. Taco Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Edward G. Staats v. County of Sawyer and County of BayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Nancy Harl, D/B/A Public House v. The City of La Salle and Mayor Aloysius A. Gunia, Liquor CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowers v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API