Legal Opinion
In Re Ferrey
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided June 26, 2001No. 2001-172-M.PPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this matter, Steven E. Ferrey, Esquire, a member in good standing of the Massachusetts bar, has moved for pro hac vice permission to provide legal services to a client in a continuing administrative proceeding before a state agency. He has done so pursuant to Article II, Rule 9 of our Supreme Court Rules. Based upon the contents of the affidavit filed as part of his motion, we grant that part of his motion seeking permission to practice before the Energy Facility Siting Board, effective as of the date of this opinion. We deny, however, that part of his motion seeking our permission,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- Rhode Island Bar Ass'n v. Automobile Service Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- Unauth. Prac. of Law Com. v. State, Department of Wkrs. Comp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- In Re Petition of ChurchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Kristopher Plante v. Daniel Stack v. Bella RestaurantSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
- In re Town of Little ComptonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- In Re FerreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Kristopher Plante v. Daniel Stack v. Bella RestaurantSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
- Soltis v. Viking Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001