Legal Opinion
In Re Ferrey
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided June 26, 2001No. 2001-172-M.PPublished
1Opinion of the Court
774 A.2d 62 (2001)
In re Steven E. FERREY.
No. 2001-172-M.P.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
June 26, 2001.
Present WILLIAMS, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ.
Lauren E. Jones, Roger Ross, Patricia French/Steven Ferrey, For Plaintiff.
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this matter, Steven E. Ferrey, Esquire, a member in good standing of the Massachusetts bar, has moved for pro hac vice permission to provide legal services to a client in a continuing administrative proceeding before a state agency. He has done so pursuant to Article II, Rule 9 of our Supreme Court Rules. Based upon the contents of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- Rhode Island Bar Ass'n v. Automobile Service Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- Unauth. Prac. of Law Com. v. State, Department of Wkrs. Comp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- In Re Petition of ChurchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.