Legal Opinion

Structured Capital Resources Corp. v. Arctic Cold Storage, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided October 24, 2007No. 12-06-00355-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice.

Structured Capital Resources Corporation (SCR) seeks relief from the trial court’s order denying arbitration of its contract dispute with Arctic Cold Storage, LLC and Mickey Cox (collectively ACS). SCR has sought relief by petition for writ of mandamus based on the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and by interlocutory appeal based on the Texas Arbitration Act. We consolidate the two proceedings. Because the FAA is applicable and SCR did not waive its right to arbitration, we conditionally grant mandamus relief. We dismiss the interlocutory appeal for want…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Citgo Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
  2. Frontera Generation Ltd. Partnership v. Mission Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
  3. Zhao v. XO Energy LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Legoland Discovery Centre (Dallas), LLC v. Superior Builders, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. In Re Royal Holding Company, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API