Malott v. Randall
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
— This is an action, commenced as a derivative shareholders’ suit, on behalf of Hecla Mining Company. The original plaintiff, Thomas Malott, owned shares of stock of a value in excess of $25,000. Emil Heber, the intervenor, owned stock of a value of $2,575 as of the date he intervened. The trial court found against plaintiff and the intervenor. Only the intervenor, Emil Heber, has appealed.
Respondent Hecla Mining Company, subsequent to the reinstatement of this appeal, Malott v. Randall, 83 Wn.2d 259, 517 P.2d 605 (1974), filed an original motion in this court, seeking an order:(1) Requiring…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Housing Authority v. SaylorsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Housing Authority v. SaylorsWashington Supreme Court · 1976