Legal Opinion

Campos v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 23, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00892Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Daniel Campos, No. CV-22-00892-PHX-ROS 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 On March 17, 2023, Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”). The R&R reasons it is “more efficient to resolve Petitioner’s 17 habeas claim on the merits” instead of first determining if the claim is timely. (Doc. 17 at 18 4). On the merits, the R&R recommends the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. 19 Petitioner did not file any objections.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Keith Smith v. Noah NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Jeffrey Ford v. Fernando GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API