State v. Odom

¶ 1. Donald Odom appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary and from an order reconfining him to prison for a 2000 conviction for operating a vehicle without the owner's consent. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Odom argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him for the burglary and reconfined him for the revocation of his extended supervision. He also contends that the trial court erred when it sua sponte vacated Odom's sentence credit for one-hundred-and-two days on the 2000 case. The State concedes…