Jackson v. Dines
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Latee County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
In November, 1819, the appellees, who were plaintiffs below, located a certain mining lode or claim upon the *91public domain in California mining district, Lake county, Colorado, under certain acts of congress, local customs, laws and regulations. In July, 1880, the Denver & Eio Grande Eailway Company, the original defendant in this action, entered upon said mining claim and appropriated a certain portion of it as a right of way for the extension and construction of its railroad. The plaintiffs brought this action to 'recover damages for the taking of said portion of their mining claim and for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- O'REILLY v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Doon v. TeshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McFeters v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Duncan v. FultonColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
- Sherlock v. LeightonWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
- Denver & Rio Grande R. R. v. HanoumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.