Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Peirce
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1900No. 3,145PublishedCited by 3 opinions
From the Howard Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, tT. —
The appellant sued the appellee, receiver of the Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas City Railroad, by appointment, as alleged in the complaint, of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana. There was final judgment in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.
The appellee and Samuel Hunt, as receiver of the Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas City Railroad, enter special appearance, and move to set aside the submission, and to set aside1 the service of notice of appeal, and to dismiss the appeal, upon the following grounds: “(1) That said suit and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Eddy v. LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Central Trust Co. of New York v. St. Louis, A. & T. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1889
- Dougherty v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hasselman v. Japanese Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Moore v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Attica Building & Loan Ass'n v. ColvertIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Welch v. British American Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905