Welch v. British American Etc. Co.
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceMcFARLAND, J.
I concur in the judgment of affirmance. I have reached this conclusion after a great deal of consideration of the main question involved, and have done so mainly in deference to the opinions of judges and decisions of courts in other jurisdictions. The fire-insurance policy involved here was issued by appellant to one Barrett. It was to be void if Barrett violated certain named conditions. Barrett did violate one of those conditions, and as to him the policy became void. But after the issuance of the policy Barrett mortgaged the insured property to the plaintiff herein, George D. Welch, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Queen Insurance v. Dearborn Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Oakland Home Insurance v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Franklin Insurance v. WolffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Boyd v. Thuringia InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Senor v. Western Millers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.