Legal Opinion
United States v. Guillermo Arriaga-Pinon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2017No. 16-50188PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Chief Judge THOMAS
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Guillermo Arriaga-Pinon (“Arriaga”) appeals an eighteen-month sentence imposed after he pleaded no’ contest to unlawful reentry following removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b). Arriaga contends that, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mathis v. United States, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), the district court erred when it applied the modified categorical approach to determine that his 2014 conviction under California Vehicle Code section 10851(a) constituted an aggravated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Naji Antoine Tokatly v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robby RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Tineimalo AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robert VederoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Alan ShelbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.