Total Holdings USA, Inc. v. Curran Composites, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
I. Introduction
This opinion addresses the request of defendant Curran Composites, Inc. to dismiss this action because this court supposedly lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Curran, a Missouri corporation with no operations in Delaware, argues that, despite its status as a general partner of Cook Composites and Polymers, a general partnership that was established by its governing agreement “in, and in accordance with the laws of, the State of Delaware,” there is no statutory or constitutional basis for this court to exercise personal jurisdiction over it.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- 800 COOPER FINANCE, LLC v. LIUDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- AlixPartners, LLP v. Giacomo MoriCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
- Alwan v. Kickapoo-Edwards Land TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Ascension Insurance Holdings LLC v. Roberts F. UnderwoodCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
- Cabela's LLC v. Ryan WellmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.