Legal Opinion

Central Bank and Trust Company as Trustee Under Land Trust No. 65-Lt-5-475, and Not Individually v. City of Miami Beach, Florida

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1968No. 25053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Property owners attacking the validity of zoning laws have a high wall to surmount. Forty years ago, in the landmark case of Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 1926, 272 U.S. 365, 47 S.Ct. 114, 71 L.Ed. 303, the Supreme Court established a test that severely limits the power of federal courts to declare zoning statutes and ordinances unconstitutional :

“If the validity of the legislative classification for zoning purposes be fairly debatable, the legislative judgment must be allowed to control. (Emphasis added).

Here, the plaintiff, as trustee, sought a building permit to construct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stroud v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Saar v. Town of DavieDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1969
  3. Toothaker v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API