Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Yijun Zhou

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2016No. 14-50288Published

1ConcurrenceGraber, Circuit Judge

I concur in full in the majority’s opinion. I write separately to question the validity of our case law with respect to the standard of review applicable to arguments raised for the first time on appeal by criminal defendants.

A federal court of appeals normally will not correct a legal error made in criminal trial court proceedings unless the defendant first brought the error to the trial court’s attention. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). But Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b), creating an exception to the normal rule, says that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API