Legal Opinion

Klein v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 2, 1930No. J-124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend, first, that under section 402 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1918, 40 *598Stat. 1097, Solomon Klein at the time of his death had no interest in the property in question which took effect in possession or enjoyment at or after that event; that the deed of conveyance transferred to his wife title to the lands in fee simple that the conveyance was complete and irrevocable, and that the grantor retained no beneficial interest in the property conveyed but" only a possibility of an interest through reversion; secondly, that if the decedent had an interest in the property…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Saltonstall v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoblitzelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API