Legal Opinion

Hoehmann v. Moss Engraving Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 5, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Charles A. Hoehmann, by Ernest Hoehmann, guardian ad litem, against the Moss Engraving Company. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made on the minutes, defendant appeals

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaveb, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant, whereby the plaintiff, a youth of 14 years, in its employment, was injured. The defendant was engaged in the engraving business at the northwest corner of Elm and Pearl streets in this city. The plaintiff was in its employ as an office boy, and had been so engaged during the preceding summer. In the building was an elevator, used for the purpose of hoisting freight, and which had been in continuous use for more than eight years without accident. This elevator consisted of a flat platform, open on all four…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Lafflin v. . Buffalo Southwestern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Dougan v. . Champlain Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Loftus v. . Union Ferry Company of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Wiwirowski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Obermeyer v. Logeman Chair Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Obermeyer v. Logeman Chair Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Colen v. Gladding, McBean & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API