Legal Opinion
Dharam v. BAHL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and Royal Insurance Company of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 28, 1997No. 96-1810PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
After he was fired as a property underwriter for Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal Indemnity”), Dharam Bahl brought this suit alleging that his former employer willfully discriminated against him and terminated his employment on the basis of his age and national origin. The district court granted the defendants’ motion , for summary judgment on both claims. Mr. Bahl now appeals the entry of summary judgment on his claim of discrimination based on national origin pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. For the reasons set forth in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry IvesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- James Hunt v. City of Markham, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Atanus v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23954p Roy A. Jackson and Carlos E. Serment v. E.J. Brach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Nellie BRASIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEINEMANN’S INC., Bakeries, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.