Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Chevron Oil Company, Additional Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Leo Buras, Jr., (1-26)-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Philibert Buras, Intervenors-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1972No. 31115Published

1Opinion of the Court

475 F.2d 1370

UNITED STATES of America,

Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Chevron

Oil Company et al., Additional

Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,

v.

Leo BURAS, Jr., et al., Defendants (1-26)-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,

v.

Philibert BURAS et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

No. 31115.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1972.

Lawrence K. Benson, Charles D. Marshall, Wilson S. Shirley, Jr., Sidney C. Schoenberger, New Orleans, La., Luke A. Petrovich, Buras, La., Turner Hudson McBaine, Donald E. Peterson, San Francisco, Cal., Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La.,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Boyle v. LandrySupreme Court of the United States · 1971

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API