Legal Opinion

United States v. Blackson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 2017No. Criminal No. 2004-0128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Court

Joseph Blackson filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Def.’s Mot. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Dkt. 1268]. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

The motion arises from a long and complicated set of criminal convictions after a joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) into a group of drug dealers in D.C. known as the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. WilhelmsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API