Legal Opinion

Marinette County v. Schmitt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In this action for money had and received, plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant $2,695 received by him from plaintiff for services which he claims and testified he actually rendered for plaintiff as the court reporter of the Marinette county court. Such an action for money had and received is deemed to be equitable in its nature; and, as is stated in 19 Am. Jur., Equity, p. 168, sec. 195,—

“It is said that the rights of the parties in such an action are to be determined as they would be upon a bill in equity and that the defendant may rely upon any defense which shows that in equity and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ellefson v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Murphy v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. DanielsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API