Legal Opinion

Dawsey v. Kirven

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1925No. 3 Div. 642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The appellant mortgagor filed a bill to redeem certain land sold -under a mortgage given by him and which was sold under the power of sale by the then holder of the said mortgage and the owner of the debt. The property was bought by the appellee for a sum less than the mortgage debt, but the balance of the debt was assigned to her 56 days after the mortgage sale, but before the effort to redeem.

The trial court granted the appellant relief and, as to this, there was no cross-appeal, but required the payment of thp entire mortgage debt as a condition to redeem instead of the amount bid at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Lord v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. First National Bank v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Chambers v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Estes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Costa & Head (Birmingham One), Ltd. v. National Bank of Commerce of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Malone v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Costa & Head (Birmingham One), Ltd. v. National Bank of Commerce of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API