Legal Opinion
Meade Fibre Co. v. Varn
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1925No. 2302PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be referred to by the positions they had below; that is to say, the plaintiff in error, the Meade Fibre Company, an Ohio corporation, will be called the defendant, and the defendants in error, W. H. and A. E. Yarn, each of them a citizen of South Carolina and copartners trading as Yarn Bros. & Co., will be styled the plaintiffs. The writ of error challenges, not only the jurisdiction of the court below over the defendant, but many of its rulings in the course of the trial on the merits. It therefore comes within the third rule laid down in United States v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. JahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. GokeySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- La Porte Heinekamp Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- Atlantic Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- R. J. Brown Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Proctor Trust Co. v. PopeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Schultz v. Long Island MacHinery & Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.