Legal Opinion

Harris v. Bornhorst

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2008No. 06-3729Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

513 F.3d 503 (2008)

Anthony HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Amanda Spies BORNHORST et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-3729.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: May 31, 2007.

Decided and Filed: January 14, 2008.

ARGUED: Daniel R. Warren, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Kenneth C. Apicella, Ellison, Nielsen, Zehe & Antas, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Daniel R. Warren, Stephan J. Schlegelmilch, Thomas D. Warren, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Timothy R. Cleary, Robert G. Stiefvater III, Cleary & Associates, Cleveland, Ohio, for…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Moore; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API