Legal Opinion
Bascom v. Weed
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action to construe a will.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This action is to construe the will of George 0. Weed, late of the town of Ticonderoga, H. T. The testator died in January, 1902, leaving him surviving three sons and one daughter. By his will he bequeathed and devised all his residuary estate, including real and personal property, to four trustees (afterward by codicil increased to five and substitutions made) in trust, in the following terms:
“All the residue and remainder of my property, real and personal, which I shall own at my death, I give, devise, and *499bequeath unto David W. Easton, Dorus 0. Bascom, John S. Weed, and Philip T. Weed (all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- In Re the Accounting of CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Warner v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Chamberlain v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Stevenson v. . LesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Murphy's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of PelgramNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of McDowellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
- In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re the Estate of JuilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938